The professor and the reading passage competes each other on whether the figure in a portrait for sale recently is teenage Jane Austen.
Firstly, the reading material suggests that the Austen family used that portrait in a version of Austen's letters and claimed that it is Austen herself in the picture. However, the professor disagrees with this argument, citing that the letters were published more than 70 years later after Austen's death, so those relatives actually have not seen Austen themselves, and they did not know for sure what she looks like.
Furthermore, contrary to the belief that the potrait assembles another sketch of adult Austen drawn by her sister Cassandra, the lecturer argues that it may be a relative of Austen who looks similar to her. He continuous that there are some experts believe that the girl in the potrait is actually a newth of Austen.
Finally, the professor rules out the possibility that the portrait was painted by Humphrey just by analysing the style, instead points out that a stamp on the canvas indicates that the canvas was bought from a merchant who did not start selling canvases in London when Austen was a teenager, thus supports the figure could not be teenage Austen herself.
All in all, based on the arguments I presented above, it is likely that the potrait does not belong to Jane Austen, as the reading passage argues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, look, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93162393162 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.398026193 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594017094017 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7799092678 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.857142857 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494407496308 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229839287428 0.0996497079465 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662712799091 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253485324608 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685008402992 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.