TPO 13
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three major implications for historic sites' excavation by the private sector. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states that regardless of some detrimental consequences, the reading exaggerated regarding the problems. Therefore, she stated some evidence to refute the adverse issue mentioned in the passage.
At first, the author argues that the public becomes deprived of getting acquainted with fossil due to their absence in the museums. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that private ownership presents a lot of these fossils for being purchased. Consequently, these fossils are available for many public organizations and libraries to buy.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that scientists miss accessing to numbers of fossils since they are being collected by the rich private collectors. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this point by clarifying the fact that this justification is not realistic. Indeed, in order to put the price on the fossils, its value should be scientifically identified. Having scrutinized the details of fossils to state their expert opinion, the scientists have a wide access to the entire fossils that had been unearthed by the private sector. Thus, undoubtedly, their limited budget to discover the fossils has nothing o do with their restrained accessible to them.
Finally, the author asserts that the private sector diminishes some precious scientific evidence while they dig up the sites due to lack of sufficient knowledge and skill in this field. The professor, though, disputes this idea by subscribing the fact that if this segment does not uncover the sites, numerous of fossils will remain undiscovered. As a matter of fact, universities or other institutions do not have much contribution and attempt in this regard. Thus, whether it would be better to discover the fossil partially or left them undiscovered completely? Needless to say that the first solution has a variety of advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'wide access'.
Suggestion: wide access
...eir expert opinion, the scientists have a wide access to the entire fossils that had been une...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36336336336 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94661473461 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588588588589 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3414624642 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35138754491 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108535823842 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864260357134 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205435208109 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112653677522 0.0443174109184 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.