TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar
The reading passage discusses that because rare and significant fossils are now being sold to private ownerships, it can negatively affect scientists and also public. The passage provides three reasons for support. However, the professor casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She apparently believes that none of these reasons are convincing enough and refutes all of them.
First, the reading states that private collectors will not allow the public to view their collections, and thus this may decrease the public interest in fossils. The lecturer, meanwhile, makes the argument that these commercials are available for purchase for everyone and schools or other foundations who are interested in these fossils can buy them. She adds that this can open up a way for displaying these remains to the public.
Second, while the passage declares that scientists are the ones who probably lose their access to the fossils and cannot reveal new discoveries about extinct life forms, the professor rejects this claim and believes that all the fossils went on a precise identification before going to any commercial procedure. She comments that it is improbable to detect the fossil without any particular experiment being done by a scientific expert. Therefore, specialists in this field will not miss any pivotal points.
Third, the lecture posits that private fossil owners often destroy valuable scientific evidence because of their little knowledge in this area. The lecturer, on the other hand, believes that if there are not any fossil discovery operations running by commercial fossil collectors, we do not have as many fossils as we have today. She says that the main crucial point is discovering the fossils not saving the scientific data.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36395759717 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75228046524 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575971731449 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.18568107 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457153608324 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143988581588 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092440555074 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267331658473 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610672869031 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.