TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice

In the northwestern United states, forest fire and vigorous storm every year cause detrimental effect to the forest. According to the article, salvage logging help to the economy and decrease the damage of the forest. In salvage logging practice is clear the dead tree from the forest area and uses the wood lumber, plywood and other wood products. Whereas, according to the lecture, salvage logging help to the recover forest but negative impact in long term.
Firstly, the passage claims that dead tree interrupt the growth of other trees and it take a year for decompose. Salvage logging provide the clear the area for new trees. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that clearing the area not guarantee to new tree growth. Decomposition of tree give the nutrition rich soil for future trees. If the remove the dead tree, so, lack of nutrition for tree it cannot the survive.
Secondly, the author emphasizes that insect attract the to decay wood such as spruce brak bettle which is harm to other tree growth. Therefore, salvage logging help to an eradication of the insect infestation and give heathy forest for trees. On the contrary, the speaker explains that spruce bark beetle lives in the more than 100 years in the forest but not any major damage to the forest trees. In fact, this insect prey for many birds. So, beneficial for both plants and insects.
Lastly, the passage implies that dead trees still usable for industries so, it can be move by worker of the local resident. Thus, help to both industrial and local people get the job. On the other hand, the professor states that large lumber wood take only by helicopter and it much expensive. Job is only temporary for local people. Besides, skilled people require than local people because of they are expert in job.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... salvage logging help to the economy and decrease the damage of the forest. In sa...
^^
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...to the lecture, salvage logging help to the recover forest but negative impact in long term...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...errupt the growth of other trees and it take a year for decompose. Salvage logging p...
^^^^
Line 2, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o, lack of nutrition for tree it cannot the survive. Secondly, the author emphasizes that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...killed people require than local people because of they are expert in job.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, in contrast, in fact, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85245901639 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30926298025 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518032786885 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0088546838 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8947368421 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.600051687466 0.272083759551 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17200484005 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086987361721 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338320180709 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096122826664 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.