TPO 16
The passage states that by increasing the construction projects in the United Kingdom, the old cultural artifacts was faced with serious problems and provides three of them. The lecturer, nevertheless, explains that for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology is changed and improved in this situation by providing three advantages of this condition.
First, the reading claims that by digging foundations for new buildings, many valuable artifacts were lost and destroyed in construction projects. Conversely, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that before starting the construction projects, the are has to be examined by archaeologists. The professor contends that in the next step, the builder makes a plan to preserve artifacts before construction. So, there is no concern about artifacts in construction projects.
In addition, the article posits that many archaeologists fell that the financial support which was funded by governments, was inadequate for archaeological research. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that the grants will be paid by construction company instead of the government. We also learn that different projects in various cities make sutiable funds for archaeological.
Finally, the passage expresses that there are little opportunities to have a career in archaeology. Quite on the contrary, the professor emphasizes that construction projects will pay different works for archaeologists such as examine the site, doing research, processing data and reporting the final paper. According to the professor, by increasing the job, the professional archaeologists will be increased too.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, nevertheless, so, as to, in addition, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78278688525 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27652336296 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5721427828 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333978205254 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107428788659 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811609678495 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181036123597 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492941874397 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.