The article states that in 20th century most archaeologist had faced serious problem in Britain and provides three reasons of support. The professor, however, said that during that period change setting of new rules and guidelines improve the situation of archaeologist and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that many valuable artifacts were lost during construction. The professor confutes this point by saying that before the construction, assessment were done by archaeologist for any historical artifacts. Moreover, she states that when any evidence is found, the committee was formed from local government and archaeologist for further planning of discovered artifacts.
Second, the article posits that archaeologist lacks funding for their research. On the other hand, the professor claims that new guidelines states that construction organization should provide funding for archaeologist to evaluate if they were planning to build a building in a given site. According to professor, due to this new rule, the archaeologist were provided with enough research funding; thus,it aided in research for many location.
Third, the reading maintains that career in archaeology was a onerous task. The professor counter this point by explaining that new rule and guidelines provided numerous career opportunity in archaeology. We have came to know that the numerous archaeologist was demanded to evaluate artifact value, for processing and preservation of historical artifacts. And also this led to increase in number of archaeologist than any other time in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal artifacts. Moreover, she states that when any evidence is found, the committe...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...vided with enough research funding; thus,it aided in research for many location. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun location seems to be countable; consider using: 'many locations'.
Suggestion: many locations
... funding; thus,it aided in research for many location. Third, the reading maintains that c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...aintains that career in archaeology was a onerous task. The professor counter thi...
^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...eer opportunity in archaeology. We have came to know that the numerous archaeologist...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, thus, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7125 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09681455962 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1892650524 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308516381197 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114535816972 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417801119916 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178956686413 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042453177225 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.