TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t
The reading passage states that the science of archaeology, which works to uncover and study old cultural artifacts, had to deal with some serious problems and restrictions in Britain. The passage provides three reasons for supporting the idea. The professor, meanwhile, casts serious doubts on this claim and refutes all of the reasons. She says, in fact, the government ratified new guidelines and rules to foster the archaeological investigations.
First, the article asserts that because of the construction projects, most of the valuable artifacts were lost or destroyed. The lecturer, on the other hand, disagrees and makes the argument that due to the new rules and guidelines, construction sites, to get permission for making the building, cannot start working without getting excavated by archaeologists.
Second, the reading declares that the monetary support for archaeological studies was not enough. Besides, the altering government priorities brought about frequent reduction in funding. However, the speaker refutes this claim by saying that due to the new rules, archaeological investments have to be supported by the construction companies. Thus, this funding from the construction firms opened new avenues for more studies and investigations.
Third, while the reading passage posits that having a job in archaeology was hard and several people who wanted to become archaeologists had to search for other careers, the professor firmly comments that new guidelines opened new job vacancies for scientists in this scope. She adds that constructions needed experts to help them in tasks such as; examining the site, processing and reporting the data. Therefore, these rules enhanced more people to continue in this field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... three reasons for supporting the idea. The professor, meanwhile, casts serious dou...
^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...erious doubts on this claim and refutes all of the reasons. She says, in fact, the governm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60606060606 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04435190351 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7221297573 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307694915978 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996359150554 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598852442057 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177405989026 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357283602583 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.