The lecture and reading both discuss bird's population. While the reading states that by increasing the human population and agriculture, people try to use pesticide and it causes to reduce the number of birds. The lecture refutes this, saying that the passage claims reducing the number of birds related to the using pesticide in agriculture, this claim is unconvinced.
First of all, the reading claims that by increasing the human population many places such as forest, grassland become disappear. However, lecture argues that it is true that some types of bird become decrease and a large type of birds become increase. According to the lecture, some place such as grassland and city proper for increasing birds.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that agriculture area should grow up because to survive the number of birds. The lecture counters this point by stating the assumption of the reading not correct because in the United Stated people improve the agriculture and variety of product without ruining wilderness.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that people in agricultures use pesticide as killing harmful insects and the pesticides polluted the environment of birds and it lead to decreasing the number of birds. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that in the past people used traditional pesticide that was harmful for birds and now people want to change the traditional pesticides at first to develop a new pesticide and second to grow crops. Moreover, the professor said that the pesticides do not harm for birds at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...ople try to use pesticide and it causes to reduce the number of birds. The lecture refute...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...olluted the environment of birds and it lead to decreasing the number of birds. The ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'as for', 'in addition', 'such as', 'first of all', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276363636364 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.163636363636 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.08 0.0723426182421 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0254545454545 0.0435111971325 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0109090909091 0.0277247811725 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145454545455 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0581818181818 0.0370669169778 157% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64439472955 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0327272727273 0.0208969081088 157% => OK
Particles: 0.00727272727273 0.00154638098197 470% => OK
Determiners: 0.138181818182 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00363636363636 0.0158828679856 23% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00363636363636 0.0114777025283 32% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1564.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 254.0 271.125827815 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15748031496 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.425196850394 0.374372842146 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299212598425 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165354330709 0.187439937562 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133858267717 0.113142543107 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64439472955 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476377952756 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.0596612106 53.8517498576 82% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0909090909 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2040832837 49.3711431718 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.181818182 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.878197800319 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 53.0121689334 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 2.4 1.90840788429 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.607407321719 0.549887131256 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.214149779608 0.142949733639 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0727135645772 0.0787303798458 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.703192573444 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122756244493 0.139662658121 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.341300669435 0.266732575781 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103621701274 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.409608121945 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0872432338243 0.0530846634433 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.46809374493 0.40443939384 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858326483104 0.0528353158467 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.