The lecture and reading passage discussing about saving Torreya taxifoga trees from the extinct. According to the reading passage three possible solutions helps to protect Torreya trees. However, the lecturer contradict the each solutions provide in the reading passage. He states that article presents three solutions getting unsatisfactory results.
To begin with, the lecturer opposes the first solution made in the reading passage that the reestablish Torreya in the same location in the Florida. He mentions that plantation of Torreya in a microclimate in Florida is impossible because of coolest and dampest area near to the warmer region. Global warming strongly effect on the microclimate area, consequently, increase temperature and unable to survive in Torreya plant in the dried region.
Furthermore, the lecturer explains that plantation of Torreya in different location getting the unpredictable result. For an example, Black Locus trees plantation on north area in which Locus species grow quickly and spread whole region. In fact, it was killed huge other plant of that area. So, moving plant on another region is danger for native plants in that areas and getting unpredictable results, all this reasons, the lecture contradict specific suggestion made in the reading passage that relocating plant by helping of the human get the survive in new place.
Moreover, the article emphasizes that storage of Toreeya in research center. This notions help to easily conduct the study and close monitoring to plants. The lecturer, in contrast, points out that Torreya kept in research center in not good idea because of it cannot resistant to the diseases. Torreya needs large and great diversity for increase population but research center in not appropriate space to catch the great diversity and protect form the diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sible solutions helps to protect Torreya trees. However, the lecturer contradict ...
^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lution made in the reading passage that the reestablish Torreya in the same location in the Flo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ating plant by helping of the human get the survive in new place. Moreover, the article em...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in contrast, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44912280702 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70378142232 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9873779519 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321005185198 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106874358619 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638994720061 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193719024086 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070358248278 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.