The reading and lecturer discussing about how to protect the Torreya trees from declining it's population but in very contrasts ways. The professor refutes the all points made in the reading passages.
Firstly, reading says that micro climate will be feasible for growing these trees because still north part of the Florida still wet and coolest, So, planting the seeds will assist the tree grow in the tampest area of northern part in order prevent declining of it's population. But, the lecture refuses that because of global warming this place already became dry. So, he states that it is not suitable place to grow these trees.
Secondly, passage claims that migrating the tree far to north the forest of the Florida by sapling the seeds, so that, entire state gets more of these trees everywhere like earlier. Again, the speaker opposes this point by stating with one example that the black locus tree which caused so many problems for the native species. Like that, migration of Torreya's seeds also will lead to the same problem and it is dangerous the plants which are the already, like competing for resources.
Thirdly, reading argues that keeping wild seeds in large amount in research and looking for feasible environment by analysing it will help the scientist to preserve these trees in large area of the state. Still, the professor contrasts this statement by saying that when the trees are there in original place, it gives the resistance the diseases whereas keeping the seeds in lab cannot develop resistance against the diseases because there is genetic capacity to prevent when it lab environment. So, they cannot survive in long term. Further, keeping large amount seeds highly impossible due to lack space.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04529616725 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30511967361 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9858928534 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24708659501 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774282134776 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614760159638 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136463691218 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264711491331 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.