In this set of materials, the lecture and passage both are discussing about different methods that can be used to help the survival of Torreya plants. The reading provides three methods that can be incorporated to increase the survival of Torreya tree. However, the lecturer thinks these ideas are not satisfactory.
First of all, the lecture states that the north Florida region no longer have the micro climate. The coolest and wetter areas are suffered due to global warming. The considerable increase in temperature has consequently, dried the wetlands in that region. This has resulted in unsuitable climatic conditions for the growth of Torreya tree. This is highly contrast to what is mentioned in reading material. It states that regrowing Torreya tree in it's original location can be useful in prevention of extinction of Torreya tree.
Secondly, another option that is discussed in text is to establish the Torreya tree in new location. The speaker disagrees with this suggestion. She mentions that the results of planting Torreya tree in new place can not be predicted. It can pose danger to the existing species of that location. She explained this by giving example of black locus plant, which was migrated to new location, killed the other endangered species of it's new location.
Finally, The orator argues that research centers are not ideal place for the preservation of Torreya species. The species cannot survive for long. This is because,the research centers do not have enough space to have massive amount of plants, so that they will be genetically diverse which is necessary to protect them from diseases. This is in opposition to the proposal provided by the passage. The writer supports the view that the plants will definately survive in research centers and will also aide in research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...cannot survive for long. This is because,the research centers do not have enough spa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he passage. The writer supports the view that the plants will definately survive ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16216216216 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66869653538 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1659156724 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4210526316 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5789473684 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40619186857 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112030721047 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870426766473 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237652428745 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055789724074 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.