TPO 19
The passage states that Buzzing, which is a new tactic used by companies for advertising, has generated a lot of controversies and critics provide three reasons of disagreement. The buzzer student, nevertheless, explains that these reasons are really misleading and has the wrong impression on people.
First, the reading claims that consumers should know whether a person praising a product is being paid to praise the product. Conversely, the buzzer opposes this point by saying that buzzing is not like ordinary advertising. He contends that this reason is not true and people will get the truth from buzzers and that is why the company hired him.
In addition, the article posits that consumers listen to their endorsements less critically that they should because buzzers pretend they are private individuals. On the other hand, the buzzer argues that this reason is not true and indeed the opposite of this reason is true. According to the buzzer, the consumers may ask a lot of questions about the products and if they do not like them, they will not buy the products.
Finally, the passage expresses that buzzing is likely to have a harmful effect on social relationships. Quite on the contrary, the buzzer emphasizes that it is a stupid idea. We also learn that consumers try to buy products because of this method in most trustful and spread honesty among people.
Thus, the buzzer disproves each of the author's reasons and try to show us buzzing is a good tactic of advertising for companies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, thus, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69289819345 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563492063492 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2671964089 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.5 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44438017365 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143852076338 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993317028106 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209105156673 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997725041947 0.0443174109184 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.