TPO 24 Integrated
The professor explains three arguments opposing the points that mentioned in the reading passage about the idea that tissues of T.rex contains remains of blood vessels, red blood and collagen matrix.
First, the reading passage claims that many small branching channels, which may be were location of blood vessels, have been found in broken legs may correspond to actual blood vessels on T.rex. However, the professor brings up the idea that these branch are much more likely to something else due to the fact that some bacteria create such hallows that often leaves behind soft and moist organism. By providing this explanation, the professor repudiates the idea presented in the reading passage.
Second, it is mentioned in the reading passage that some spheres have been found in inner parts of bone which means it could be remains of the red blood cells. Also, these spheres contained iron that is crucial for blood cells' performance. On the contrary, the professor draws attention to the fact that these spheres have been discovered in different organisms in same place. Even, scientists found blood cells in organism that had not blood vessels in their anatomy. So, mentioned evidences indicate that not only spheres are not originated to T.rex, but also they would come from outside of dinosaur's body.
Third and last, although the reading passage asserts that performed test demonstrates presence on collagen in the dinosaur leg bone, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that collagen can remain about 100 000 years. So, finding collagen in bone of an animal which belongs more that 70 million years ago is dubious, indeed, it is improbable. As the professor states, this collagen can remain from much more recent source. For instance, it can be belong to remains of researchers' skin who were handling the bone. Thus, the professor presented contradictory evidences that are convincing to reject this fact either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'blooded'.
Suggestion: blooded
...nd blood cells in organism that had not blood vessels in their anatomy. So, mentioned...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 598, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rejecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: rejecting
...radictory evidences that are convincing to reject this fact either.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15506329114 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4679385401 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534810126582 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4085942289 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.357142857 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382295086718 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132293590602 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898372601229 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234234938712 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459724294243 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.