In the article, the author suggests that in the recent research scientist have found evidences of the remains of red blood cells, blood vessels and collagen matrix in the leg bone fossil of the T. Rex dinosaur. However, the speaker cast doubts on the claims made in the passage by giving following reasons.
First, the passage mentions that leg bone consists of soft flexible material suggestive of relics of blood vessels. In contrast, the speaker states that when an animal die there is bacterial colonization in its bones. The bacteria feed on the remains of soft, moist tissue, thus these relics could be the traces of organic material left behind by the bacteria.
Second, the author describes about the presence of spheres inside the bones that could be red blood cells. But the professor challenges this point and explains that there were fossils of other animals as well who did not have red blood cells in them but even they were found to have the spheres with dark red centres in their bones, so this could be the pieces of reddish mineral. Therefore this point made in the passage does not prove anything.
Third, the lecturer further claims that the last hypothesis mentioned in the passage about the existence of collagen matrix is also controversial. The speaker tells that the collagen matrix or its derivatives are not present in the animals that are dead for more than 1000 years. On the other hand, T. Rex dinosaur has been disappeared for over seventy million years. Thus, there are high chances that collagen could have come from the skin of the researchers handling the bones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...could be the pieces of reddish mineral. Therefore this point made in the passage does not...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'well', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.30303030303 0.261695866417 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.141414141414 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0707070707071 0.0723426182421 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.03367003367 0.0435111971325 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016835016835 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154882154882 0.128828473217 120% => OK
Participles: 0.037037037037 0.0370669169778 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.33795495169 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.003367003367 0.0208969081088 16% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.003367003367 0.00154638098197 218% => OK
Determiners: 0.127946127946 0.128158765124 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.013468013468 0.0158828679856 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016835016835 0.0114777025283 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1608.0 1645.83664459 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89010989011 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351648351648 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.249084249084 0.287516216867 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.157509157509 0.187439937562 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0769230769231 0.113142543107 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33795495169 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 55.892920779 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.75 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0441110989 49.3711431718 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 132.220823453 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 47.6584249084 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.57894736842 1.90840788429 135% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.761573200753 0.549887131256 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129730752927 0.142949733639 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0801125087603 0.0787303798458 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.656261663425 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159521972717 0.139662658121 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.386466164601 0.266732575781 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155355430314 0.103435571967 150% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.440767009078 0.414875509568 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0675078339468 0.0530846634433 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.585537495362 0.40443939384 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477912615027 0.0528353158467 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
I am looking forward to this great source as I think it will help me a lot.