TPO 27
The passage states that the little Ice age was a period of cold temperature in many parts of the world and provides three possible causes of this occurrence. The lecturer, nevertheless, explains that there is no new information in the passage and all of them are out of date.
First, the reading claims that melting glaciers sent a large amount of cold freshwater into the Gulf stream that affects earth's climate and this disruption could have caused the little ice age. Conversely, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that disruption of ocean currents caused cooling in Europe and some parts. The professor contends that because this disruption of the ocean did not happen in other areas such as Newsland or south Africa, it not explain the little Ice age.
In addition, the article posits that volcanic eruption could have caused the little Ice age. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that the volcanic eruption might produce a visual effect that people could notice them at that time, as well as, dark clouds of dust and sulfur gas. According to the professor, having no report of these effects such as brown snow instead of white snow indicates that this reason is not strong enough to affect global temperature.
Finally, the passage expresses that considerable decreases in human population may have contributed to the cooling of the climate. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer emphasizes that there was not enough time for this to work. We also learn that by increasing the population so soon, the forest trees started to be cut down and thus this reason is not long enough to cause global cooling of the climate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'explains'?
Suggestion: explains
...uch as Newsland or south Africa, it not explain the little Ice age. In addition, the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91007194245 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43884096262 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7470196118 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.090909091 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06452816374 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494764571855 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176297094604 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125201747969 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267872397012 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777349442843 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.