In the given set of material, the author suggests three possible hypotheses that could be responsible for the Little Ice Age. However, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubts on those theories by providing evidences.
First, the passage describes that the fresh cold water from melted glaciers went into Gulf Stream and disrupted it which caused this phenomenon. The speaker refutes this point and explains that the disruption took place only in Europe and America but the effect was seen everywhere, that is, even in Southern areas like New Zealand and South Africa. Hence, this does not explain everything.
Second, the reading tells that the volcanic eruption caused it as it blocked the sunlight from reaching Earth’s surface. The professor states that although there was not enough dust to produce cool climate to such an extent that It would but it could cause this phenomenon because it would have happened then it would have surely been noticed by people by certain striking features in sky or things like dramatic colorful sunset or grey/brown color snow. But nothing like that happened and so it is incorrect to blame volcanic eruption for this phenomenon.
Third, the author depicts that the decrease human population lead to decrease in forests and thus it caused decline in carbon dioxide resulting in Little Ice Age. In contrast, the lecturer rebuts this argument and reveals that the human population grew back rapidly and thus they cut down forests to feed their growing population and so the amount of carbon dioxide did not decrease to such an extent that it could possibly lead to this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Little Ice Age. However, the speaker in the follow up material cast doubts on those theori...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... not decrease to such an extent that it could possibly lead to this phenomenon.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could possibly lead to this phenomenon.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, second, so, then, third, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06273062731 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40461333181 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.6433104268 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.2 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331463564451 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114634081652 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772702396002 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164745620166 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335035935165 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.