TPO 32
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the several theories of weird and mysterious sound which Russian submarine have had heard for 20 years.
First of all, the professor argues that Orca whales are usually live in surface of ocean while submarines were located in deeper parts of ocean. So, it would be unlikely that submarines' sonar and detection equipment could able to hear Orca whales sound during their ritual courtship.
Second, the professor opposes the idea presented in the reading about the sound source that claims strange sound may caused by giant squids. She states that sounds were heard by submarines for about two decades and disappeared for several years. Therefore, how could it possible that a creature make noise for 20 years and stop to emit it suddenly for long period? In addition, submarine sonar can easily detect squids if they are nearby and juxtapose to the submarine.
Third and last, the professor states that sound waves, which Russian submarines received, were moving around quickly and change its direction continuously, an issue that is impossible based on exist technology. In addition, we are not able to manufacture silent submarine engines so that sonars always receives other submarines engines' waves. Thus, the professor repudiates this idea depend on mentioned arguments.
So, in summary, the professor has gone totally against the hypothesizes presented in the reading. She states that the weird waves could not be caused by Orca whales, giant Squids and advanced unknown technologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...of ocean. So, it would be unlikely that submarines sonar and detection equipment could abl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, in addition, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33992094862 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54029378889 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600790513834 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2711372667 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.583333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393107995605 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135012442358 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790016526291 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204317565367 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945337238311 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.