Tpo32
Both the reading and the lecture discuss about strange noises in the place that submarine are patrolling. While the author claims that there are three facts that make us believe that froglike sound are there, the lecture doesn’t accept it and provide some pieces of evidence to state that these hypothesis are wrong.
First, the reading says that this strange noise is made by male and female orca whales during a courtship ritual. However, the lecture disagrees. According to the lecture, submarins are in deep part of seas, but orcas make sounds on the surface of water. So this hypothesis does not make sense.
In addition, according to the reading passage, giant squids can cause the noise there. They are in deep in the ocean and prey on large fish. Their complex brains show that they are intelligent so they can emit huge sound. Conversely, the lecture disapproves this point of view. She points out that, these weird animals were detected in 1960, but this strange noise was recognized in 1980, two decades later.
Furthermore, the text points out that, this noise can be made by foreign countries submarine. They are patrolling in that area as a military technology services. On the other hand, the audio part rejects this. He argues that submarines can not change their direction but the source of the sound change quickly and their engine sound is different from orcas sound. Nowadays wedo not have technology that makes the submarine silent and fast.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re three facts that make us believe that froglike sound are there, the lecture do...
^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this hypothesis' or 'these hypotheses', 'these hypothesises'?
Suggestion: this hypothesis; these hypotheses; these hypothesises
...e some pieces of evidence to state that these hypothesis are wrong. First, the reading says tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent from orcas sound. Nowadays wedo not have technology that makes the submarine...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97177419355 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34506575104 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588709677419 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1368548451 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0625 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354708325102 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104991334594 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741226104516 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203293237543 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561621533622 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.