The passage and lecture both discuss the source of the weird sounds that were heard by employees in Russian submarines protecting North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The passage points out three main possibilities for these sounds. In contrast, the professor explains that she is not sure about the source of this marvelous phenomenal and she refutes each author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that Orca whales could be the source of these sounds. However, the lecturer denies this by explaining that although this theory seems to be true, it is unlikely that these sounds were produced by Orca whales. While Orca whales live near the surface, submarines move in deep water, and as a consequence sailors could not hear the whales' sounds. Moreover, if there was any whale near the submarines, they could be detected by sonar system.
Second, the article claims that very big squid could be the source of aforementioned sounds. In contrast, the lecture indicates that the sound started in the 1960s and reported for two decades, but the enormous squid are living there for all time. In other words, there is not any reason for sounds to hear and stop suddenly.
Last, the passage puts out that another secretary submarines could cause these sounds. On the other hand, the speaker states that the sound can move and change direction very fast, while submarines cannot move so quickly. Besides, all submarines make engine noise. But this noise is different from quackers sounds. According to the lecturer, even today, we do not have a submarine that move too fast with a soundless engine.
Essay evaluation report
Second, the article claims that very big squid could be the source of aforementioned sounds
Second, the article claims that a very big squid could be the source of aforementioned sounds
Second, the article claims that very big squids could be the source of aforementioned sounds
but the enormous squid are living there for all time.
but the enormous squids are living there for all time.
there is not any reason
there is no any reason
another secretary submarines could cause these sounds.
another secretary submarine could cause these sounds.
have a submarine that move too fast with a soundless engine.
have a submarine that moves too fast with a soundless engine.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 265 250
No. of Characters: 1288 1200
No. of Different Words: 148 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.035 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.86 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.313 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.62 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.554 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
In actual TOEFL exam, the
In actual TOEFL exam, the mark or score is compared to other users. It is not a absolute mark. For example, if all test takers are good students, then the marks they get in this year may be same to other test takers in last year who are not good students.
while in testbig, even you do all grammar/ideas correctly, it doesn't mean you can get 30 out of 30. The score is compared to best students/users too. So even though you may get only 26/27 in testbig, possibly you still can reach 30 out of 30 in a actual exam.
If you can get 26/27 in testbig, it means you don't need to do anything except sending more essays to check out whether you can keep 26/27 all the time.
Well, if you still think I need 30 out of 30, this will take a long time, instead, we would suggest you put the time on something else like listening or reading, your weaker section.
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257525083612 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.150501672241 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0535117056856 0.0723426182421 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.056856187291 0.0435111971325 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0167224080268 0.0277247811725 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123745819398 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0234113712375 0.0370669169778 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.39882491703 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0100334448161 0.0208969081088 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0066889632107 0.00154638098197 433% => OK
Determiners: 0.137123745819 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0234113712375 0.0158828679856 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0066889632107 0.0114777025283 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1595.0 1645.83664459 97% => OK
No of words: 265.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01886792453 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362264150943 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256603773585 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162264150943 0.187439937562 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101886792453 0.113142543107 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39882491703 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.098376869 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6666666667 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1509283417 49.3711431718 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 132.220823453 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.878197800319 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 43.3270440252 50.5018328374 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.80597014925 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.676230542798 0.549887131256 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111714753541 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0684872023432 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.537845534278 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.1516161075 0.139662658121 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271597560968 0.266732575781 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116419689246 0.103435571967 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.342639270332 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0287991082237 0.0530846634433 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.481036847859 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386471684724 0.0528353158467 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.26048565121 258% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 11.0 3.1766004415 346% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.