tpo 34 integrated
The lecture and the reading both discuss the extinction of the marine mammal sea cow. Which, the reading states three theories to support the main causes of the sea cow extinction the lecture refutes this saying non of the theory are convening and each one of the theory has a problem.
First of all, the reading claims that over hunting of the ea cow by Siberian people id the main cause of the extinction. However, the lecture argues that the sea has a massive size. Furthermore, the professor states that a couple sea cows can feed the Siberians population; there was no need for over hunting.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that because the ecosystem disturbance the sea cow food decline which is the kelp, subsequently cause decline in the sea cow population. the lecture counter this point stating that there were no experience of food shortage. According to the professor if the was a disturbance in the ecosystem it will also affect other mammals not only the kelp, but there were no evidence of any effect on whales for example, the population of whales stay the same.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that European traders are other cause in the extinction of the sea cow. They caught the last cow on 1768. The lecture refutes this claims by pointing out that the sea cow population were already decrease in there numbers before the arrival of the European. Moreover, the professor says that soon after the European arrive to the area the sea cow extinct. The professor mentions that main cause of the extinction still unknown.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ause decline in the sea cow population. the lecture counter this point stating that...
^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood shortage. According to the professor if the was a disturbance in the ecosyste...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85820895522 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46641508795 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485074626866 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5409026252 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.153846154 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470946135279 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190536773185 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855913530137 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310361357932 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643002705836 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.