The lecturer talks about strict regulation for handling and disposal coal ash. He believes that this strict regulation essential for protecting environment. He repudiates each argument presented by representative of the power company.
First of all, the representatives emphasize that environment regulation already practice in companies such as uses of linear in new pond and landfill. The lecturer, in contrast, mentions that linear material not sufficient to protect land from harmful chemical. Linear only implant in new land and pond but in old does not, so perishable chemical seep in to soil and contaminate to the water. Prevent leakage only by following disposal rules.
Secondly, the analysts imply that uses coal ash recycled products harm the products image and customer discourage to purchase it. This point challenged by lecturer. He explains that customers do not hesitate to buying recycle product because it made under strict regulation. For example, customers less concern about mercury because of it is handle strict and safely by regulation.
Finally, the reading passage states that increase cost of power company for handling and disposal lead to increase the prices of electricity which not acceptable to public. The lecturer made suggestion for this point. He says that cost of power companies might be fifty million dollars but it cost worthy and consumer has only one percentage contribute for electricity which is all people affordable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...ses coal ash recycled products harm the products image and customer discourage to purcha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47136563877 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84691949488 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603524229075 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5959753835 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7142857143 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424006066563 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126473681584 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101187003238 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226561528406 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658359453847 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.