tpo 42

Essay topics:

tpo 42

Both the reading and the lecture discuss buildings' glasses which are very dangerous for wild birds. In the reading section, the writer proposes three possible solutions to declining the danger of buildings' glasses for birds and provides three reasons for support; however, in the lecture the professor casts doubts on reading points by indicating that these solutions are not effective.
First of all, the writer claims that one-way glasses can be useful for both occupants and birds because people can see outside, but birds cannot see inside, so birds do not fly toward glasses; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that one-way glasses sometimes are as same as a mirror. Since birds cannot detect mirrors, they may fly through them when they see the image of tree or water in one-way glasses.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that using colorful designs on regular glass can be beneficial because birds can detect stripes on windows and avoid do not fly through the glass; conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that strips are too thin to be detectable for birds and also, using thick strips hampers people from watching outside.
In addition, the writer mentions that using magnetic field can help birds to navigate in the right direction during flying; on the contrary, the professor indicates magnetic field can work just for long destinations for example when birds migrate from cold city to warm city, but if they just fly from one side of a city to another part of it, birds' ability to sense magnetic fields will not work, so birds in short distances use their eyes to navigate. Hence, this idea is rule out.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in short', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262987012987 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.149350649351 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0844155844156 0.0723426182421 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0616883116883 0.0435111971325 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0194805194805 0.0277247811725 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146103896104 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0324675324675 0.0370669169778 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.30849972979 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227272727273 0.0208969081088 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0876623376623 0.128158765124 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0324675324675 0.0158828679856 204% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00974025974026 0.0114777025283 85% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1660.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 279.0 271.125827815 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94982078853 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365591397849 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283154121864 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.161290322581 0.187439937562 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0931899641577 0.113142543107 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30849972979 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.539623497131 104% => OK
Word variations: 57.9220299179 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 39.8571428571 21.7502111507 183% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 142.762968959 49.3711431718 289% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 237.142857143 132.220823453 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.8571428571 21.7502111507 183% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 0.878197800319 260% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 68.1725550435 50.5018328374 135% => OK
Elegance: 1.91549295775 1.90840788429 100% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.632107506935 0.549887131256 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.191765641777 0.142949733639 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10895737329 0.0787303798458 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.749061673927 0.631733273073 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.279801957337 0.139662658121 200% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301819909726 0.266732575781 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126128516088 0.103435571967 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.26972125614 0.414875509568 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0135236322079 0.0530846634433 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.406075607986 0.40443939384 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607158301274 0.0528353158467 115% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.