TPO 42 integrated
In the Reading part, the author proposes several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds while they are trying to fly through glass windows. However, the lecturer is critical of what the author states and refutes these solutions correspondingly.
First, as put forth by the author, one-way glass is only transparent to occupants of the building and act as a solid barrier to birds, preventing birds to fly through it. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this solution, mentioning that these glasses act like a mirror to birds and reflect the sky or trees. Therefore, these glasses mislead the bird to fly through them.
Second, the author points out that using colorful designs such as painting thin stripes over the glass is an effective solution because birds will avoid trying to fly through the glass. The lecturer, nevertheless, cast doubt on this solution, contending that the space between patterns perceive as an open hole to birds and the will fly through them. if they design these spaces as small as possible as an alternative, the room will be too dark for people.
Third, as it has been claimed by the author, creating an artificial magnetic field will guide birds away. While, the lecturer does not consider this solution plausible and posits that birds only use their natural ability of sensing magnetic field when they are travelling a long distance. In the short distances, birds use their eyes to determine where they want to go. Therefore, the artificial magnetic field does not seem to be an effective solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...o birds and the will fly through them. if they design these spaces as small as po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08396946565 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57256438676 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56106870229 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.70896341 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522595707345 0.272083759551 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197369291651 0.0996497079465 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110749424737 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312338489544 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051048760591 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.