The lecture and passage are discussing different ways to prevent the accident of birds due to hitting glass buildings. The passage provides three solutions to tackle this problem. However, the lecturer found these solutions very unconvincing.
First of all, the speaker argues that using one way glass in a building is a terrible decision. This is because, the one way glass will reflect like a mirror. The sky and trees will get reflected on the buildings which will confuse the birds and they might get hit on the building. This theory was refuted in article. It states that by replacing clear glass by one way glass can be a solution to this problem. The occupants will able to see outside and birds would not be able to see inside and will consider the building as a barrier and will stay away from the buildings.
Second, the lecturer posits that coloring the glass buildings with paints isn't a good solution. He mentions that the gaps in paintings can deceive birds as holes and when they will try to strike through it; they will get hurt. Furthermore, if the gaps in the painting are made smaller the occupants would not able to see much from inside the building and will also create darkness in the room. The writer however, is convinced with the idea of painting the glass with paints can provide a good solution to the problem.
Finally, the orator is also against the third and final solution mentioned in article. It states that artificial magnetic field can be created around the buildings. As the birds uses earth's magnetic field to navigate while flying; the magnetic field around the building will keep birds away from it. The speaker disagrees and states that birds uses magnetic field only while migrating longer distances. They do not make use of magnetic field just to travel from one part of the city to another. Importantly, they use their eyes and light from sun to navigate shorter distances. So use of artificial magnetic field is ineffective in preventing birds from hitting the glass building.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...oloring the glass buildings with paints isnt a good solution. He mentions that the g...
^^^^
Line 7, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificial magnetic field is ineffective in preventing birds from hitting the glass ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42349582466 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456896551724 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9840491753 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513834695993 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152874235739 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819517663802 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296211822136 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810833181693 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.