The article states that the coin that discovered in Main city is fake and not came by European explorers and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that the silver coin is not fake and represents genuine pieces of historical evidence that came by European explorers. And she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that the location where the coin discovered is located very far from other sites documenting a Norse presence in North America. The professor refutes this point by explaining that there are other objects that have been found in the American cite that came from far away places. Since the Native American travel great distances to obtain objects, it could have been reached to the Norse settlements and brought the coin silver.
Second, the article claims that no other coins found ar the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse, so the coin has no real connection with the settlements. The professor, on the other hand, states that no other coins discovered deos not necessary mean there is no relation. For the reasons that teh Norse did not inhabited the area permanently, they went back to Europe. So, they backed with them all valuable items, including the silver coins. She concludes that when the Norse came at first to North America, they brought the silver coins, but when they returned with them when they got back to Europe.
Third, the reading posits that the silver coin would most likely be useless, since it did not recognize by the North Americans. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that this is true point. But, the Norse brought silver coins to the North AMerica because of its value. In addition to, its nice and very beauty appealing, therefore, they could use it for trading with other items. For example, these silver coins could be traded with jewelries and nickels. ALso, the professor adds that since the North American were interested in valuable staff, they could traded with their items to get it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, states that no other coins discovered deos not necessary mean there is no rela...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'inhabit'
Suggestion: inhabit
... For the reasons that teh Norse did not inhabited the area permanently, they went back to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'trade'
Suggestion: trade
...nterested in valuable staff, they could traded with their items to get it.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94428152493 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30400761277 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492668621701 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1777618134 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1764705882 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.534350616689 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167893651767 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108729781056 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321977960662 0.162205337803 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873924126684 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.