Apparently they have been a lot of debates about weather the coin dating to eleventh century that was found at the Native American archaeological site in state of Main in the United States is a genuine piece or face. In the lecturer the professor tries to convince the class that this coin piece is not a fake despite the evidence that the author gives in the article. She opposes every claim made in the lecture.
First issue of controversy is the significance of the distance between the state of Maine and the Norse Settlements. The lecturer explains that many belongings were found far away from where the Norse used to be, and so they may have travel with coins. That challenges he first point in the reading that it is not possible that Native Americans have rich this state.
Second issue is that no other coins found. The professor coins out that that Norses did not create any permanent settlements , as a result they had to pack their valuables, and so they may dropped this piece of coin unintentionally. That is why the lecturer refuses to accept the author`s explanation that the Norses did not bring any silver coins with them.
Finally, the issue of that the Native American could not use coins as money. The professor puts forth the idea that eventhough native American may have not interested jewellery, but they would definitely interested in beautiful silver piece, as they may had find it attractive and unusual. Consequently, they may have used it to trade with it.This disputes the third claim the author made in the lecture that Native Americans may not have recognize the coin as a money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...er coins found. The professor coins out that that Norses did not create any permanent set...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...did not create any permanent settlements , as a result they had to pack their valu...
^^
Line 10, column 205, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...ed jewellery, but they would definitely interested in beautiful silver piece, as they may ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 259, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...beautiful silver piece, as they may had find it attractive and unusual. Consequently...
^^^^
Line 10, column 259, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...beautiful silver piece, as they may had find it attractive and unusual. Consequently...
^^^^
Line 10, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... they may have used it to trade with it.This disputes the third claim the author mad...
^^^^
Line 10, column 440, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'recognized'.
Suggestion: recognized
...ture that Native Americans may not have recognize the coin as a money.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 462, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
...cans may not have recognize the coin as a money.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, finally, first, if, may, second, so, third, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58455617053 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503571428571 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.902633702 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478675052245 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177030509584 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854460097698 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285758865366 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443060404908 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.