The reading passage contends that there are several points why some archeologists believe that a European silver coin is not original historical evidences. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this agreement.
To begin with, the lecturer questions the validity of the reading passage that Maine where the coin was discovered in the Native American site is located in the distance from where a Norse presence in North America was documented. This is attributed to the fact that there are another object including the coin had brought from far distance. It presents that the Native American had traveled far distance. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the reading passage that there was no other coins have been discovered at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse. This is because at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse had created valuable objects using permanent sediment. Further, the Natives brought back with valuable coins and other objects when they are returning from there. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the idea in the reading passage that the Norse who traveled across the Atlantic Ocean would have understood that the coins would be likely to them being useless. It is obvious that the Natives have already known that the coins are valuable and appeals them to bring them into their place because it also looks beautiful to them, such as necklaces and Jewels. As a result, the reading passage’s last point is refuted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage contends that there ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...points that contradict this agreement. To begin with, the lecturer questions th...
^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'objects'?
Suggestion: objects
...uted to the fact that there are another object including the coin had brought from far...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...passage's first point is invalid. Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e's second point is contradicted. Last but not least, the lecturer disagre...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24584717608 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.179401993355 0.158904122519 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0897009966777 0.0723426182421 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398671096346 0.0435111971325 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299003322259 0.0277247811725 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106312292359 0.128828473217 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0598006644518 0.0370669169778 161% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60032466031 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0166112956811 0.0208969081088 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00332225913621 0.00154638098197 215% => OK
Determiners: 0.129568106312 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00664451827243 0.0158828679856 42% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0299003322259 0.0114777025283 261% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1662.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 267.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22471910112 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36329588015 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314606741573 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198501872659 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104868913858 0.113142543107 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60032466031 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 49.5249485845 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5384615385 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2620882047 49.3711431718 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 51.9991356958 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.65333333333 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.724362544854 0.549887131256 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152401711029 0.142949733639 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105424788844 0.0787303798458 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.623013534901 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154799412638 0.139662658121 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.330991469174 0.266732575781 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156080085092 0.103435571967 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.432395914594 0.414875509568 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0601084323471 0.0530846634433 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.515180491476 0.40443939384 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108082688314 0.0528353158467 205% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.