The lecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened for real.
First, some members got free rides. That is, some didn’t work hard but gotrecognition for the success nontheless. This also indicates that people who worked hard was not given recognition they should have got. In other words, they weren’t given the oppotunity to “shine”. This derectly contradicts what the passage indicates.
Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are nore responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower than individuals in dicision making. Groups needed more time for meetings, which are neccesary procceedures in decision making. This was another part where experience contradicted theory.
Third, influetial people might emerge, and lead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent
people are going in the right direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is nobody that has enough influence to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the leader, and might be less flexible in thinking. They might become one-sided, and thus fail to succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are going in the r...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238596491228 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.175438596491 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0701754385965 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0385964912281 0.0435111971325 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0245614035088 0.0277247811725 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.101754385965 0.128828473217 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0315789473684 0.0370669169778 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74393417799 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0175438596491 0.0208969081088 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00350877192982 0.00154638098197 227% => OK
Determiners: 0.101754385965 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210526315789 0.0158828679856 133% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0350877192982 0.0114777025283 306% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1524.0 1645.83664459 93% => OK
No of words: 241.0 271.125827815 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32365145228 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369294605809 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265560165975 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199170124481 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132780082988 0.113142543107 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74393417799 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639004149378 0.539623497131 118% => OK
Word variations: 69.8794159479 53.8517498576 130% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.1764705882 21.7502111507 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3877887194 49.3711431718 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 132.220823453 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1764705882 21.7502111507 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.878197800319 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 40.7324871857 50.5018328374 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.55882352941 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362740507814 0.549887131256 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0846316736759 0.142949733639 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0648964651841 0.0787303798458 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.505909373876 0.631733273073 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175276922034 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124621922158 0.266732575781 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721311292441 0.103435571967 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.18425824572 0.414875509568 44% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0475146068834 0.0530846634433 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217630404812 0.40443939384 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631971217188 0.0528353158467 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.