TPO 8 - Integrated: Chevalier's memoir
In the reading, the author claims that Chevalier's memoir, which was written regarding his adventures throughout his lifetime, is not precision by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states some evidences to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that the loan of the Swiss merchant undermined his assertion concerning his wealth. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that this debt had nothing to do with his fortune. Indeed, spending considerable amount of money for parties and gambling, Chevalier needed cash, but he had to sell his properties at the first place. Therefore, as it took some day till he received the money, he had no other choice but borrowing in order to pay the expenses.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that Chevalier conversation with Voltaire could not have been preciseness since the talk had been occurred several years ago. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that Chevalier wrote the details of the conversations every single night. Consequently, it is possible that he kept his notes for all those years. Furthermore, witnesses of his death verified that he possessed the consolidated notes which probably utilized them for preparing the memoire.
Finally, the author asserts Chevalier was able to break out the prison in Venice due to his political connection across the country not his nobility to use metal means to make a hole. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by subscribing to the view point that there were some other individuals with strong political relationships, but they could not run away nonetheless. Moreover, the valid documented attributing ti the old Vanish government revealed that the cell of Chevalier repaired forthwith after his escape. Undoubtedly, if he did not escape, the wall would not require any additional fixation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orrowing in order to pay the expenses. In addition, the reading passage holds t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22397476341 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85312352785 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627760252366 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5419413065 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820635308927 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278602745684 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035263077857 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546477416366 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209711961702 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.