tpo19
Both the article and the lecture are about Buzzers who are paid by some companies to advertise companies' products to their friends or others that buzzers know them. The reading provides three reasons that Buzzers can have destructive consequence in the community; however, the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the reading. A buzzer speaks in the audio and he finds all arguments unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading declares that people should know buzzers because they expect their friends to be honest with them. Instead of gaining correct data about a product, people may receive incorrect information. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He points out that the companies usually find a person who has used the companies' goods. If a product could make a person satisfied; therefore, this man is willing to contribute with company as a buzzer. It goes without saying that a buzzer provides his personal experiences with the product.
Secondly, the reading passage contends that people usually accept their friends' advice easily and faster than other sources like TV, radio and you name it; hence, this event can harm them. Since in confronting TV's ads, they have ability to discern wrong information; subsequently, TV does not provide danger for them as much as their friends can. This argument is rebutted by the buzzer. The lecturer states that people ask a huge number of questions about a products such as price, quality and service and so on; as a result, if buzzers do not answer them in a logical way, they will not want to buy that good.
Finally, the article believes that this approach can increase dishonesty among friends; conversely the buzzer refutes this suggestion and expresses that if a product is really in a low quality, the companies would not find the buzzers. When one who has experienced acceptable quality from a product, shares their experiences with his friends, this can boost trust feeling in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a product' or simply 'products'?
Suggestion: a product; products
...le ask a huge number of questions about a products such as price, quality and service and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical way" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...a result, if buzzers do not answer them in a logical way, they will not want to buy that good. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03363914373 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56950623957 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6785594006 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303162637254 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102459828359 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057024809327 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182995885766 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653409052241 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.