tpo24
Both the reading and lecture are about a fossil of Tyrannosaurus that possibly its actual tissues have remained. The reading provides three reasons to advocate this discovery; however, the lecturer cast doubts on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that fossil of leg back of T.rex revealed several branching channels inside bone that they could have been hollows inside bone where blood vessels were set. Moreover a soft, flexible substance is another strong evidence for the remains of actual blood vessels. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He points out that this soft substance may be from another source. The professor elaborates on this by mentioning that the bacterial could have colonized in these hollows and then they fed on small organisms, so this substance is a trace from their waste.
Secondly, the article contends that researchers could find the spheres that may have related to red blood cells. Since the red blood cells' task is that they have to transport oxygen to tissues; consequently they have been a pivotal part of animal. Furthermore, the spheres included dark red center with iron. This argument is rebutted by the professor again. The lecturer expresses that scholars would find this reddish color in a huge number of animals from that same place with T.rex's fossil; hence the main source of this reddish color may have been from another point.
Finally, the reading passage proposes that collagen which is a fibrous protein as a vital component of living bone tissues, found in T.rex's leg bone; conversely, the professor believes that the oldest organism with the remains of collagen associated with 100.000 years ago while the date of T.rex returns to 70-million years ago. The best explanation for this suggestion is that this collagen may have been transported to T.rex's bone by researchers' hands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...side bone where blood vessels were set. Moreover a soft, flexible substance is another s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13375796178 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47268332917 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8134121999 49.2860985944 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416268712639 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128435625656 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839506850641 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225183823803 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822543318291 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.