Tpo3

Essay topics:

Tpo3

Both the reading and lecture discuss on a paint-which it is about a woman- related to Rembrandt. The reading provides some evidences that this painting is not belonged to Rembrandt, however the professor dose not concur with it and the information he expresses contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, it can be derived from text; there is an inconsistency in clothes. On the one hand the woman has worn a cap like servants' cap; on the other one the woman's coat seems very expensive due to luxurious fur collar. The article does not believe such a mistake by Rembrandt, In contrast the lecture claims that when the pigments of the painting was cleared by x-ray technology, it revealed that fur collar has been added to the painting later and it is not original. Some people may have wanted to rise up the value of painting.
Moreover, it can be derived from the article that the light and shadow are not fit with each other, while Rembrandt was a professional in light and shadow ground. The woman's face is light, however the collar's color is dark; consequently the collar must absorb this light instead of reflecting it, on the contrary the professor declares that after eliminating fake pigments, it was found that the collar's original color was light.
The final point, presented in the reading is that the panel of painting has been made by several pieces of wood, while Rembrandt was used to working on single piece of wood. At the same time the lecture casts doubts on the mentioned point by taking into account on the fact that the analysis of the woods shown that they were the same type of Rembrandt's wood, and these pieces added later for boosting the painting's value.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228395061728 0.261695866417 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.175925925926 0.158904122519 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0895061728395 0.0723426182421 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432098765432 0.0435111971325 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0308641975309 0.0277247811725 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141975308642 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0679012345679 0.0370669169778 183% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.4691472124 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0185185185185 0.0208969081088 89% => OK
Particles: 0.00308641975309 0.00154638098197 200% => OK
Determiners: 0.148148148148 0.128158765124 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0123456790123 0.0158828679856 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00308641975309 0.0114777025283 27% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1708.0 1645.83664459 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71237458194 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314381270903 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.240802675585 0.287516216867 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153846153846 0.187439937562 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0936454849498 0.113142543107 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4691472124 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545150501672 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.3631086264 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 29.9 21.7502111507 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9777429903 49.3711431718 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.8 132.220823453 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9 21.7502111507 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 53.9802675585 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.75308641975 1.90840788429 92% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.154721633067 0.142949733639 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.104504495231 0.0787303798458 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.683491897906 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.195265369112 0.139662658121 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.454947881574 0.414875509568 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0246987910235 0.0530846634433 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
No. of Words: 299 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

This is too much from reading:

'it can be derived from the article that the light and shadow are not fit with each other, while Rembrandt was a professional in light and shadow ground. The woman's face is light, however the collar's color is dark; consequently the collar must absorb this light instead of reflecting it,'

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 299 250
No. of Characters: 1385 1200
No. of Different Words: 152 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.158 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.632 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.435 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.545 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.38 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4