TPO47
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable explanations regarding this idea that Pterosaurs, which was a large winged reptiles lives concuurently with the dinosaurs, was not capable to fly. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text, and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that since the Pterosaurs was cold-blooded similar to the moder reptiles, it could not have able to generate sufficient energy for flying. Conversely, the lecturer coontens that on the basis of recent discoveries, there was a hair covering on the body of Pterosaurs which resembalence the feathurs. Indeed, this hair coverage is an indication of this fact that this reptile was warm-blooded since same as those have feathurs, this layer assisted them to keep the high temperture of their bodies in extreme cold climate. Therefore, having been warm-blooded, Pterosaurs would able to produce adequate energy to fly.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that so large was this animal that it is impresuasive to flap their wings and flight such heavy body. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this idea by clarifying the fact that Pterosaurs hd some features which made its body light. For example, its bones were hollow instead of solid. SUbsequently, these hollow bones lowered the weight of its body substantially and enabled the animal to falp regardless of its huge body.
Finally, the author asserts that the weak back legs of the Pterosaurs did not supply enough power to launch it into the air. The professor, thought, repudiate this point by subscribing the fact that this assumption were ture, if the pterosaurs would take off like the birds. In fact, there is a paramount difference between these two animals. Ptersaurus utilzed four limbs (legs) instead of mere tow back legs; hence, using all of four legs, the animal would able to produce sufficient power to jump push the ground and fly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1021021021 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68924577785 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8945843442 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338247736856 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109816518258 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735069954698 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177109015386 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067965771495 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.