TPO6_Integrated Writing
The authors of the reading passage depreciate the importance of communal online encyclopedia, arguing that they have numerous disadvantages. The lecturer, however, refutes the arguments of the reading passage due to the following reasons.
First, online encyclopedias have less errors inasmuch as they can be corrected by online users. This assertion is apparently in contradiction with the statement of the reading passage that there is more inaccurate information in online encyclopedias.
Second, hackers can not have access to the indisputable and crucial information inasmuch as these parts of articles are not editable_ they are provided only in read-only format. Here comes another disagreement between the reading and the lecture.
Third, the fact that a variety of topics are covered in online encyclopedias is, in fact, a virtue, not a disadvantage. Traditional encyclopedias can not provide their audience with various topics for the have limited space, and hence, they have to exclusively decide which concepts are more essential and neglect the rest of the topics. This contradicts with the reading passage that has considered this fact as a disadvantage.
To sum up, the lecturer believes that, even though neither online nor offline encyclopedias are comprehensive, the online versions are far better than offline ones according to the above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ns. First, online encyclopedias have less errors inasmuch as they can be correcte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, hence, however, second, so, third, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.625 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11287588923 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2097447568 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.