TPO9
In the reading passage, the author calims that there are three viable explanations for substutiting the fuel-cell engines with internal combustion engines. However, finding the ideas impausible and qeustionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states the points mentoined in the passage were optimistic. Therefore, she points out some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that the sources constituting the hydrogen using in fuel-cell engine are accessible in a wide range of forms which are renewable. Conversely, the lecturer brings up that the sources are not as easily available as it was stated in the text. Actually, if the hydrogene is supposed to generate from water, it requires to should be purified which is artificial process. Therefore, the natual form of water is not utilization. Moreover, in order to use water suitable for creating the hydrogene, the advanced labratories will be need that were equiped with technologies to cool the water in substanial lower degree. COnsequently, its usage is not practical so easily.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that using the fuel-cell engine can solve the air pollution problem since water is the only debri of this device. On the other hand, the lecturer dimisses this idea by clarifying the fact that this assetion is not true since the manufactures producing the hydrogene have no other choice but buring the oil or coal. Thus, although, the hydrogene does not emit contaminated material into atmosphere, the factories producing it do so.
Finally, the author asserts that the cost of fuel-cell engine become reasonable due to people's inclination to use it due to its efficient usage of energy. The lecturer, thought, disputes this idea by subscribing the fact that the the expenditures will be add up owing to saling the constly engines. Indeed, the factories produce these engines should apply petrolium , which is very expensive metal, in order to make the engine having chemical reaction and generate electricity. Having used cheaper metals, the producers did not get desiarbel result; hence, petrolium is their only option. As a result, the mass production os fuel-cell engine will not redice its price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
... atmosphere, the factories producing it do so. Finally, the author asserts that ...
^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... this idea by subscribing the fact that the the expenditures will be add up owing to sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... this idea by subscribing the fact that the the expenditures will be add up owing to sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uce these engines should apply petrolium , which is very expensive metal, in order...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24512534819 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.805550055 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576601671309 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6119963174 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.764705882 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 63.6247240618 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.