The new telescope
The lecturer starts her lecture by saying that he was already fascinated by science when she was at school. Despite the fact that her science teacher said that such science classes were not right place for girls; this was not encouraging at all as she thinks now. But it was just introductory to start the real topic that is about the space and how people can research it.
Nowadays, telescopes to look into cosmos are situated in remote locations such as, for example, deserts in Chili. When the sun light dims, these areas provide an exquisite view of the night sky full of thousands of starts. If to think why these devices are placed there, we may come to the answer that it is absolutely impossible to research the space in towns or other settlements because of the glare of cities.
Also, it is mentioned that it is just an exaggeration that the most famous Hubble telescope is capable to look into remote and distant pieces of cosmos. By 2018, the GMT is supposed to become a successor of the Hubble. As it will be more powerful and sensitive, it will be able to see not only galaxies and big planet, but also such tiny objects as satellites and dwarfs. This new telescope will comprise several mirrors, and the total square of the telescope will be comparable to an ordinary university lecture room.
By implementing such powerful equipment people will have all odds to learn more about the space.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45746381482 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6893930876 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147059544032 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507740617664 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100837943016 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700487275625 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090958247157 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.