Advantages and disadvantages of studying the plays and theatrical art which were written centuries ago?
The effect of learning the performing artistic works from eras, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of studying those works has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on generations over the years. It can be said that learning the staged arts from ages generates both merits and drawbacks. This essay will elaborate how this activity can benefit to the learners and how its negative effects are and thus will lead to a reasonable conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous ways how the students can obtain merits from learning aged plays and staged arts from centuries but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that those works can supply historical and cultural values to the learners. As an illustration, Shakespeare’s theatrical arts have assisted the children to learn English language in high school for a long time. Moreover, not only learn people from past mistakes displayed in the tragedy plays but they also can embrace their souls by the love theatrical arts. By this way, the learners may develop their aesthetic aspects in mind.
Nevertheless, there remains some drawbacks, which certainly overwhelm the potential influence of studying performing works from eras, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that some learners can gain unrealistic perspectives about life. For example, tragedy plays can render the audiences pessimistic about living and hopeless in their love. In addition, there could be several illusions obsessing the learners for years after studying horror plays. Thus, people should raise their caution and consciousness as learning theatrical arts.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the merits of absorbing theatrical works are prominent although its setbacks should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...r a long time. Moreover, not only learn people from past mistakes displayed in the tra...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38487972509 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76638919047 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8599982202 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126974494027 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045718044764 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246524257446 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754240002384 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330419987723 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.