Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the work place, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against ol

Essay topics:

Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the work place, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?

In this contemporary era, partiality on the outcome of work based on age is very common. though junior employees work hard, management instinctively take decisions to award senior people. Even though it is a matter of discussion, in my opinion, the discrimination against senior employees must me made illegal.
Firstly, junior employees are increasingly suffering from the unfair decision-making as their hard work and dedication is being taken away by their seniors. this is due to influence and rapport the seniors build with their management. For example, a recent employee survey conducted in abc company revealed that the number of junior are not satisfied with the rating they have given. Apparently, older people in the organization grabbing credit of their juniors.
Secondly, promotions are being given to the older people who don't deserve and disappointing younger employees. older people often take away credit and talent from their co-worker. For instance, recent studies revealed that employees from abc company resigned due to an unfair decision taken by management to support older people. Hence the discrimination towards older people must be abolished.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the age discrimination needs to banned in order to make fair decisions and motivate younger people.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this contemporary era, partiality on the outcome of work based ...
^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
...me of work based on age is very common. though junior employees work hard, management ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... senior employees must me made illegal. Firstly, junior employees are increasing...
^^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n is being taken away by their seniors. this is due to influence and rapport the sen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...are being given to the older people who dont deserve and disappointing younger emplo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Older
...ve and disappointing younger employees. older people often take away credit and talen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... by management to support older people. Hence the discrimination towards older people...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, for example, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45192307692 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94073613133 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2809163083 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179632509248 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654581676558 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471224231115 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112471454229 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300892637004 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.