Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago?

Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter whether high school drama which was written centuries ago is good or bad. Whereas some people say that these theatres plays are a waste of time, I sanguinely believe that they are useful. This essay will further discuss the reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that these plays help students to overcome the fear of public speaking which further helps students in their professional life. In my own experience, when I was in high school, I was so shy to speak in front of the public, but after I participated in the annual school drama my fear was vanished, which helped me gain a lot of self-confidence. Hence, the benefits of participating in theatre play apparently can be seen.

On the contrary, sceptics say that school dramas distract students from their study. The play requires a lot of rehearsal which eats up a lot of student's valuable time. Due to this, the students who performed in the school drama's are outperformed by the other students. Therefore, school management should dump this centuries-old drama culture.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of participating in school play far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of drama participation prove its significance, but also prove its privileges in students professional life.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02671755725 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85856459212 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572519083969 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1310617457 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241840285527 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945169676997 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557640463322 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145650554475 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655253007449 0.0609392437508 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.