People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons?
Recently, the phenomenon of many people is unable to separate their work and personal life and its corresponding impact have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of focus on one aspect of life is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. Some opponents are inclined to believe feeling satisfied due to maximizing use of time can be a plus.
Within the realm of professional thinking, detaching career and family can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that demerits of family obstructions, as well as various interruptions at work, are inextricably bound up. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of accuracy in staff is correlated negatively with non-working calls. Moreover, beneficial ramifications of having family-pleasant times without work stresses apparently can be seen.
However, from an economic standpoint, combining private and professional spheres might increase the consequences of maximizing the benefits of overtime. In other words, the fundamental aspects of earning more money and doing responsibilities perfectly could relate to this reality that the demerits of flawed tasks pertain to time scarcity. According to my own experience, when I worked in a company, at night, I did some of my tasks at home while I hang out with my family. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of balancing between family and being a responsible employee.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, some profoundly believe the benefits of mingling the job and family life far outweigh its drawbacks. But others suppose not only do the disadvantages of merged domains prove the significance of concentration, but also pinpoint relaxed mind implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48829431438 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23672909781 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658862876254 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4653453484 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806176317613 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273130856358 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411960392484 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455789204234 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305455691046 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.