In recent years, whether the influences of xenophobia in western countries sparked heated debate. Although such an issue is contested by many, it is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. This essay will provide a rationale behind this behavior, which leads to a conclusion.
To begin with, there are several reasons why xenophobia should support, but the most remarkable reason is immigrants taking job opportunities from native people, which boost unemployment rates. Moreover, immigrants who came with their families create a community, which can lead social racist reactions. Hence, the government should educate people about human rights and protect immigrants’ families. Political actions, NGO activities, welfare support, democratic policy can help to reduce the effect of xenophobia.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why xenophobia should not support it. Firstly immigrants are the most important part of economic growth. According to the research conducted by a Human Rights Association of Australia, immigrants contributed more than 50% of economic growth.
In conclusion, after showing both sides, the disadvantages of xenophobia overweighted the advantages. So, individuals and the government must take action for the solution of xenophobia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most important part of economic growth. According to the research conducted by a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, moreover, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 20.9802955665 24% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 242.827586207 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89119170984 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12383243511 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699481865285 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9894764365 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146065327993 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526608591651 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578745238643 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887257032112 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542083264371 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.