Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In a fully functional democracy, there are politicians making unrealistic promises just get elected or re-elected. They sounds like pompous, but for a public hungry for change they mistake it for plausible promises. It leads to unattainable expectation, which gives way to utter disapppointment. I agree with the statement in the question that politician should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus.
Come election days and we would be surrounded by high promises and speech full of quixotic optimism. Politicians seem to have cure for all problems and beseech the public to bring them to power, so that they could use their magic wand. Election days brings hope to public who are dissatisfied with present situation and they are hungry for sugar-coated words to solve their problems. Public tend to believe the politician's claim to have simple problem to a complex problem. One important and unfortunate thing is that these politicians know that they are all delievering empty promises. The public often believe those promises and elect them to power with high expectation. They would expect their newly elected leaders to take quick action and those action should bring quick result, which they were promised to have. For example, a politician try to leverage anti-corruption mood of public and promise the public to bring back black money from off-shore accounts. He is declared as a hero and elected to power and when he fails to deliever not because he didn't want to but it's impossible to solve the problem overnight. The public might question the credence of politician and it could lead to political unstability.
Economic growth is one of the key issue faced by numerous nations where inflation tend to eat up people's savings. Some politicians take advantage of such environment and declare that they have a plan to fix the economy and provide job to all. The popularity of that politician would go up and the first thing he might do after coming to power is to take loan from international organisation like IMF or another country like China. These loans could cripple the economy, if they are not paid ,antithetical to the intended result. The nation might need to introduce austerity and make some cuts in healthcare or education. This has happened to some countries like Greece and many countried would face such problem in future.
Leaders should be pragmatic when makinf vision for their constituency. They should not aim for making high-tech Maglev train network when the existing railways is in dilapidated shape. The decisions should be made step by step without skipping a single step. However, politicians should not stop making bold promised which is attainable and diffficult. If such promised are fulfilled, it would be for greater good for the nation. For example, in an closed stagnant economy, a politician could promise to open the economy to make the domestic industries competitive (rather than complacent) and provide a much needed investment by foreign investors.
Democracy is for the people, by the people and of the people. Politicians should not make mockery of this institution by deliberately misguiding voters to garner their support. They do need to take bold steps to resuscitate economy or to maintain law and order, but making unrealistic promises should be refrained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'sound'
Suggestion: sound
...es just get elected or re-elected. They sounds like pompous, but for a public hungry f...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'cured'.
Suggestion: cured
...otic optimism. Politicians seem to have cure for all problems and beseech the public...
^^^^
Line 2, column 745, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this action' or 'those actions'?
Suggestion: this action; those actions
...lected leaders to take quick action and those action should bring quick result, which they w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1057, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...hen he fails to deliever not because he didnt want to but its impossible to solve the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h environment and declare that they have a plan to fix the economy and provide jo...
^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ripple the economy, if they are not paid ,antithetical to the intended result. The...
^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... many countried would face such problem in future. Leaders should be pragmatic when maki...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 446, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...er good for the nation. For example, in an closed stagnant economy, a politician c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2781.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81830375879 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512962962963 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.353031841 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.8965517241 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6206896552 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.37931034483 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144654178545 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044502718487 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601384085727 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983300929641 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640243184563 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.