Co-workers are the people who work with us together. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good co-worker? Use specific details and examples in your answer.

Essay topics:

Co-workers are the people who work with us together. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good co-worker? Use specific details and examples in your answer.

Recently, many cases of dispute in countless companies have been reported. Seemingly, the incentive behind the quarrels were, according to expert, the absence of certain qualities in employees. Thus, I am of the opinion to claim that punctuality and communication are critical skills I look in co-worker. I feel this way for the few reasons which I will explore.

To begin with, being punctual is just an integral aspect which every fellow worker should be endowed with. In other words, A co-worker must respect the time, and stick to the schedule. By doing so, we are likely work at our pace and complete the tasks before the due date, which means the chances to receive gratifications and promotions increased. For instance, last year I was working on a new constructing scheme, which is supposed to be finished in one week. My friend and I managed to validate the mission in just three days this due to our respect to the time and thanks to our time managing. Our boss was speechless towards the work we have done, thus he decided to add a supplemental sum of money every mouth. This example demonstrates how importance the punctuality is.

Subsequently, another peculiar quality is the ability to communicate. To elucidate, today's workers are bereft of the most paramount aspect, therefore they struggle to adapt and get integrated in the collective work. A taciturn fellow add no plus to the team, its existence is trivial no matter what he could done, he should develop the ability of interaction. The lack of communication leads to no results. Take my example again, our strategy of success relies mainly on communicating the independent work and strive to match it then create the ideal plan, thereby eliminating the shortcomings and imprecise estimations. We were harmonized and coherent due to the impeccable feedback circulated between us.

To wrap up, I am inclined to claim that respecting the time and the capacity to communicate and interact with the other are essential qualities that define a perfect co-worker.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the few reasons which I will explore. To begin with, being punctual is j...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s how importance the punctuality is. Subsequently, another peculiar quality i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have done' or 'do'?
Suggestion: have done; do
...ence is trivial no matter what he could done, he should develop the ability of inter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...endent work and strive to match it then create the ideal plan, thereby eliminating the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able feedback circulated between us. To wrap up, I am inclined to claim that ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02958579882 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91901953512 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612426035503 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0444500505 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183556647184 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522061945092 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549853949059 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116081631134 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270091602642 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.