The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The given tabulated section illustrates about the distribution of forested lands among six different parts of the world in the years 1990, 2000, and 2005. The unit for measurement is given to be in hectares.

The table overall illustrates that the part of Europe has the maximum share whereas the Oceania has the least of the forest lands. Forest lands' area measure in the part of Europe, which was in it's nadir in the year 1990 with 989 million hectares, increased gradually to 1001 million hectares in the year 2005.

The amount forested lands in the areas of Africa, South America, and Oceania follows the same trend from 1990 to 2005, facing atrophy in the 25 years given. But, South America, and Africa found to have almost 60 million hectares of forest lands less when compared the amount of their forest lands in the year 1990 to the year 2005 whereas, Oceania lost only 2 Million hectares of forest land from the year 1990 to 2005.

North America, Oceania maintained their Forest land amount constant from the year 1990 to 2005. They had 708, 199 Millions of forest lands respectively in the year 1990 which were although decreased by less than or equal to 3 million hectares of forests lands, they may be considered as insignificant when compared to the loss of forest lands in rest of the areas.

But, Asian, North American forest lands' area measure seem to be peculiar. It's number which was 576 million hectares in the year 1990, got decreased to 570 in the year 2000. However, the number got increased and reached it's peak of 584 million in the year 2005.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...measurement is given to be in hectares. The table overall illustrates that the p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rement is given to be in hectares. The table overall illustrates that the part...
^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1001 million hectares in the year 2005. The amount forested lands in the areas o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he amount forested lands in the areas of Africa, South America, and Oceania follo...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tained their Forest land amount constant from the year 1990 to 2005. They had 70...
^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '199 million'.
Suggestion: 199 million
...m the year 1990 to 2005. They had 708, 199 Millions of forest lands respectively in the year ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 2005. They had 708, 199 Millions of forest lands respectively in the year 19...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72463768116 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28996972745 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460144927536 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9352313096 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.545454545 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174373573448 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831540942336 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509503052557 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12364833993 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270331648076 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.