In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or

Essay topics:

In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

With the growth of the modern education system, the ideology of becoming well-rounded individuals is ubiquitous. What criterion should be given more weight to assessing the efficient method of cultivating well-rounded individuals? Some claim that all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature, which may be plausible at a cursory glance. Nevertheless, this above view has merit, I argue that it is in fact ill-conceived at all. The reasons are stated as follows.

To begin with, I must express appreciation to the view of encouragement of widening knowledge for all college students. The students who take the art course and literal course will no doubt enhance their knowledge and improve their capabilities of humanity area. All these social science courses related to art and literature will bring the students to think more about the society.

On the contrary, it is dangerous to abide by the side of the view that all students have to take the courses of art and literature. Students in different departments have different major courses which will forge them to be a specialist in a different area. Most of the major courses are not easy to pass without hard work on it. For these students who have limited capabilities to handle with their major course, it definitely will bring big troubles for them if extra art and literature courses are compulsory to them. If they failed in their major courses after spent much time on art and literature course, the result biases the initial purpose and will impair the students' future.

That being said, tenable the assertion may hold in most circumstances, I would like to suggest giving options for the college students to make choices on their own. If college students can manage their time and energy to balance the art and literature courses with the major course after evaluating their capabilities, they will benefit from the art courses. To provide the various choices to all students, rather than an obligation for them, is the best method to mold the college students to become well-rounded individuals.

To sum up, in modern society and the education system, well-rounded individuals are welcome by society. As for how and what will adopt to realize this purpose, I reserve my approval for the idea that college students should be requested to take courses in art and literature course, which is dogmatic and will bring unpredictable results for these limited capabilities students. Providing the option for the students to choose is the best way for colleges and universities.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...me by society. As for how and what will adopt to realize this purpose, I reserve my appr...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, well, as for, in fact, no doubt, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82214187088 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467592592593 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1802454315 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.526315789 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29009103059 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946863004506 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828735413475 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184354011632 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909283179109 0.0667264976115 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.