The first pie chart gives an overview of the average energy used in an Australian home. In comparison, the second chart depicts the amount of greenhouse gas emitted from this energy used.
As the diagram suggests, heating consumes 42% of the total energy which is majority of the total energy utilized in an Australian household. It is followed by water heating system which requires 30% of the generated power. Other appliances consumes 15% energy which is higher in relation to power utilized by refrigeration, lighting and cooling.
Moving to the second chart, the water heating system contributes a large proportion of greenhouse gas emission that is 32%. Other appliances, though consumes lesser percentage of energy, emitted almost double amount of energy (28%), similar is the case with refrigeration which releases 14% of the total energy. Heating emitted comparatively lesser energy (15%). The percentage of greenhouse gas emission remained moderate in terms of cooling and lighting.
As an overall trend, warming up is the most prominent matter in case of consumption and emission of energy. Whereas, cooling up had the least notable change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of consumption and emission of energy. Whereas, cooling up had the least notable chang...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32417582418 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77703092108 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7394284908 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0909090909 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374956816876 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135493098161 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116327106889 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224654997162 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170186616206 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.