Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prompt suggest that judgment should be come from expert rather than who has a has little knowledge. I mostly agree with the prompt an argue that critical judgement should be come from an expert for two reasons.
First, can anyone judge anything? It this is true there were no need to further study in a particular field. People choose to study to gain knowledge and to be expert in a particular field. For example, doctors obtain more degree after them under graduation to become an expert. A doctor who is a expert in a heart surgery he/ she does not give opinion / judgement on bone fracture of a patients. Doctor always refer to another doctor if the problem of the patient of expertise area. So, critical judgment should be come from who is pundit in that particular field.
In addition, can a banker find bug in a software? Banker works for the bank they know everything about money, but does not know anything about software. If someone tell a banker to find a bug, he will not able to find anything because he/ she does not know how to find a bug. Any company will not recruit a banker to find a bug. They will definitely hire a software engineer, because they know how to find bug in a software and their opinion and judgement has value-- they are expert in that particular field.
In conclusion, of course any can judge anything by look at their presence, however it is not a critical judgement. Critical judgement is to get depth understanding and find fault and good site of that work. Thus, expert should give critical judgement on a particular field otherwise it will not be valued.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'?
Suggestion: come
... prompt suggest that judgment should be come from expert rather than who has a has l...
^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...owledge. I mostly agree with the prompt an argue that critical judgement should be come ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'?
Suggestion: come
...argue that critical judgement should be come from an expert for two reasons. Firs...
^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...on to become an expert. A doctor who is a expert in a heart surgery he/ she does ...
^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a patient' or simply 'patients'?
Suggestion: a patient; patients
...opinion / judgement on bone fracture of a patients. Doctor always refer to another doctor ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'?
Suggestion: come
...e area. So, critical judgment should be come from who is pundit in that particular f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who is pundit in that particular field. In addition, can a banker find bug in a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tells'.
Suggestion: tells
...now anything about software. If someone tell a banker to find a bug, he will not abl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey are expert in that particular field. In conclusion, of course any can judge a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... field otherwise it will not be valued.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60975609756 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48286712238 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491289198606 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4408431533 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8235294118 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188078912977 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673869494637 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631019806375 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129254291404 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608130215212 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 100.480337079 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.