“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, cars play a pivotal role in going to other places because it is more convenient to go to a certain place without changing trains or considering time. However, car emissions, which contain CO2, are quite harmful to our nature. Therefore, some countries’ governments have been trying to reduce car populations. I personally agree that there will be fewer cars in use in twenty years. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
To begin with, CO2 is harmful to our bodies and our planet because it has the power to destroy our nature and will cause air pollution. For example, many countries have experienced these effects during the industrial revolution because people prioritized industrial growth instead of protecting the environment. As a result, our nature could not maintain its cycle and caused many natural disasters, such as sand slides and climate change. These are irreparable, and are still deteriorating our planet's natural beauty. In other words, we have a responsibility to protect our environment.
Therefore, many companies or governments encourage us to use public transportation, including trains and busses. because it is not as harmful as mass traffic. Therefore, it is feasible to reduce the number of cars in two years in terms of the environment.
Secondly, the disparity between the rich and poor is a thorny issue in many countries. If there is no public transportation due to the authority of rich people, they can not live any more in the name of fairness. Some countries’ governments have revised their marking up taxation though. Propagating transportation is also a viable solution to deal with the country’s issues. On top of that, public transportation is much cheaper than purchasing an individual car. Therefore, official transportation services are fair for everyone, even though the rider may be poor or rich, because the fee is the same.
In conclusion, it is feasible to reduce cars in order to curb environmental issues due to cars, and disparity between the rich and the poor. These are the
There are two main reasons. I definitely agree that in two years, the car population will be fewer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...portation, including trains and busses. because it is not as harmful as mass traffic. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...portation, including trains and busses. because it is not as harmful as mass traffic. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n two years in terms of the environment. Secondly, the disparity between the rich...
^^^
Line 4, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or or rich, because the fee is the same. In conclusion, it is feasible to reduce ...
^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een the rich and the poor. These are the There are two main reasons. I definitely...
^^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years, the car population will be fewer.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04738301004 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6981821965 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179637175845 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621622958543 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118102854034 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105619758105 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869791835249 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.