Some people like to do only what they already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks, Which do you prefer. Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
Althoug doing something you have never done before could be a little scary, I personaly prefer trying new things and taking risks over doing only what I already know. There are a couple of reasons for this and all of them will be thoroughly discussed in this essay.
First of all, I believe that only people who are trying new things and constantly learning new skills could move forward in their life. We all start from zero and we are all required to learn some skills through life. As we get older there are fewer things in life that we need to learn to survive. But if you’re asking me, this should not, by any circumstances, mean that we should stop learning new skills. Maybe we don’t need this skills to survive, but there is a good chance that this new thing we tried would help us move to the right direction in life. This new skill that we got could get us a new, more exciting job, or it could help us get promoted in our original job. Opportunities for growth are not limited only by professional bounderies. They are practicaly endless and are concerning your professional as well as your personal life.
Secondly, I think that if you are only doing things you have done before and the things that you are already good at, you would miss out on life. The whole fun of life is trying new things and getting new experiences, and if you’re not doing that what’s the point. Eventually, you will get board and then you will ask yourself “Did I miss on some good opportunities in my life?”
In a conclusion, trying new things could only improve your life on the professional level as well as on the personal level. If you only do what you already do well there is no space for improvement. Eventually, you would find yourself bitter and angry that you didn’t take more risks in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ired to learn some skills through life. As we get older there are fewer things in ...
^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...earning new skills. Maybe we don’t need this skills to survive, but there is a good ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 787, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...deries. They are practicaly endless and are concerning your professional as well as your perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, i think, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50151975684 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41328581221 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471124620061 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3054269116 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320714947484 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123271068628 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110774588577 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237232262595 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781226386157 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.45 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 86.8835125448 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.