The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, *20.., and future projections for 2025.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the number of income from Southland’s three main groups of exports in the years of 2000 and 2020 also for prospective projections in 2025.

According to the data, international tourism gave the most revenue to Southland from all main exports in three different year. In 2000, international tourism contributed approximately $8 billion to the city. The following 20 years, the revenue kept growing to nearly $9 billion. Southland predicted this variant of export will exceed to just $10 billion within 5 years. There had some significant difference to the rest 2 exports. Dairy products’ revenue in 2000 was only around $7 billion, but the number rose rapidly approaching to $10 billion. These products foresaw the income will fall slightly to just above of $9 billion. Lastly, meat products had the lowest revenue than the other exports. Starting with exactly $6 billion as the revenue in 2000, the digit kept decreasing to around $5.5 billion and predicted will also decrease to $5 billion in next 5 years.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional tourism contributed approximately billion to the city. The following 20 ye...
^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...onal tourism contributed approximately billion to the city. The following 20 years, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears, the revenue kept growing to nearly billion. Southland predicted this varian...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...rs, the revenue kept growing to nearly billion. Southland predicted this variant of ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roducts’ revenue in 2000 was only around billion, but the number rose rapidly app...
^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come will fall slightly to just above of billion. Lastly, meat products had the l...
^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the other exports. Starting with exactly billion as the revenue in 2000, the digi...
^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...e other exports. Starting with exactly billion as the revenue in 2000, the digit kept ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion and predicted will also decrease to billion in next 5 years.
^^
Line 3, column 826, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...on and predicted will also decrease to billion in next 5 years.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21472392638 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80567380278 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5684290065 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126533387644 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545028073133 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743959337148 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162144025634 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937215394112 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.